We're making big changes. Please try out the beta site at beta.ccel.org and send us feedback. Thank you!

Scripture and Tradition? Where does Tradition stand?

Loutzenhiser's picture

We will continue the 2 Tim and 1 Thess here. I will bring the last posts from each thread here.

Let me define the thread subject here. We all agree that Scripture is foundational to the church, but where does tradition stand and what tradition.

Some questions -

Is a tradition considered to be apostolical even though it is announced and defined at a later date?

Must a tradition have some other supporting evidence or is the church's "word" good enough for it to be considered canonical?

Is Dogma tradition or just a church's view?

What support must a tradition have to be canonical? (such as multi-church support?)

Are views and teachings about a tradition also tradition or just a church's opinion?

De Maria's picture

What are you comparing to Robert?


Its simply a matter of whom you chose to believe. I believe the Catholic version of the facts.

Because I believe Scripture. And Scripture says that the Church is the Pillar of Truth and that it will never fall to the gates of hell.

So, it is easy for me to see that whomever wrote that bit of history was a fallible man whose opinion I won't follow. I would rather believe Scripture.

Whom would you rather believe?